Sections
Once again, stars are illustrated by the open star cluster the Pleiades in the figure below/above (local link / general link: pleiades.html).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/pleiades_2.html");?>
We explicate in the following subsections.
A spectrum is taken by measuring fluxes in very narrow wavelength bands.
A spectrum therefore gives information about the spectral lines which are usually (but NOT always) very narrow in wavelength for stars.
An atom/molecule above the photosphere absorbs light from the photosphere of the star and creates a narrow dark line in an image spectrum or narrow trough (which is called a line) in an intensity spectrum.
Such lines are absorption lines.
This analysis in general takes modeling of the stellar atmosphere, but stars fall into standard classes as determined by spectra and other means.
Once a stellar class has been modeled accurately, then the modeling has been done once-for-all---well once-for-all until better modeling is done.
But nowadays, star spectrum modeling is very advanced at least for the most common spectral types.
In order to understand
stellar spectra,
a key determinant of the strength of the
spectral lines
is obviously the
stellar composition
which is approximately
solar composition,
except for variations in the total
metalliticity.
See
Table: Gross Solar and Primordial Cosmic Compositions by Mass Fraction
below
(local link /
general link: solar_composition_metallicity.html).
    EOF
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/solar_system/solar_composition_metallicity.html");?>
Because stars are mostly hydrogen, we expect to see
atomic hydrogen lines:
in the visible these would
be the Balmer lines.
For the Balmer lines,
see the figure below
(local link /
general link: line_spectrum_hydrogen_balmer.html).
In the late 19th century
and early 20th century, the
spectral types
were fixed
just empirically (i.e., based on observed characteristics alone)
before modern spectral analysis was invented.
Each spectral type
was designated by a capital letter.
Originally, the
spectral types
went AB...P and represented decreasing strength of
Balmer lines
(FK-422;
CK-286).
But this ordering turned out NOT to be very physically
significant: it was NOT a temperature ordering.
At low temperatures, the lines are weak because the energy
state they depend on is NOT much EXCITED: i.e., NOT
many atoms are in that state.
At high temperatures,
hydrogen tends to be ionized: i.e.,
it has lost its only electron and become a bare proton.
Bare protons are very simple objects and have no atomic
transitions and NO lines.
The Balmer lines
tend to be strongest for temperatures of order 9000 K
(FK-424).
The standard modern spectral types
are OBAFGKM: these are in order
of decreasing
photospheric temperature .
The OBAFGKM stellar classification
can be remembered by the mnemonic
"O be a fine girl/guy kiss me."
The
spectral types
are divided into subtypes: each type has a ten subtypes: 0, 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in order of decreasing temperature within the
type.
Thus, for example, one has stars of
spectral types:
We can look at examples of star spectra of various
spectral types
in the figure below
(local link /
general link: star_spectra.html).
Thus, it's a middle of the pack star---but NOT an "average star":
spectral types
are too diverse for average of all stars to be a useful concept.
Still we use the
Sun as convenient standard
and use
solar mass M_☉,
solar luminosity L_☉,
and
solar radius R_☉
as natural units
for, respectively, stellar mass,
luminosity, and
stellar radius.
Notes: The OBAFGKM spectral types can be remembered by the
mnemonic
"O be a fine girl/guy kiss me."
(Sometimes the only sensible thing to say.)
The LT types are brown dwarfs
which are NOT stars.
Brown dwarfs have
masses in the range 13--75 M_Jupiter.
The upper limit is 0.08 M_☉. They do NOT burn ordinary hydrogen.
They briefly burn deuterium (the stable heavier
isotopes
of hydrogen) and, if above 60 M_Jupiter,
lithium.
Most of the their electromagnetic radiation
emission comes at the expense of the
gravitational potential energy
lost in contraction.
See CK-306 and
FK-424.
The OBAFGKMLT types can be remembered by another mnemonic, but I can't remember
what it is (FK-424).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/optics/prism_animation.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/spectra/line_spectrum_hydrogen_balmer.html");?>
The Balmer lines are further explicated in
the
atomic hydrogen (H I)
Grotrian diagram
in figure below
(local link /
general link: grotrian_01_00_H_I.html).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/atomic/grotrian/grotrian_01_00_H_I.html");?>
We also can expect helium lines,
metal lines, and, in cooler
stars,
molecular lines (lines of bound systems of atoms).
Although metals and
molecules are only traces in
stars, they have
many lines, some of them very strong.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/nasa_spectra.html");?>
The strength of Balmer lines
is NOT monotonic
with temperature: i.e., they don't just get stronger or weaker as
temperature increases.
Rather than rename the
spectral types---that would have been the easy way---the types
were re-ordered and a few were dropped
(FK-422;
CK-286).
Sometimes the only sensible thing to say.
There are other less common
spectral types.
O0, O1, ... , O9
G0, G1, G2, G3, ... , G9
M0, M1, M2, M3, M5, M6, ..., M9 .
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_spectra.html");?>
And "you must remember this ...," the
Sun is a
G2 star.
To paraphrase Protagoras (ca. 490--ca. 420 BCE),
the Sun is the
measure of all stars.
For the solar units in detail,
see the insert solar_units.html
below
(local link /
general link: solar_units.html).
EOF
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/sun/solar_units.html");?>
We can look at
Table: Spectral Types
to see the characteristics of the main
spectral types.
Table: Spectral Types
Spectral Color Photospheric Spectral lines Examples
Type Temperature
(K)
O blue-violet 30,000--50,000 Ionized atoms, Mintaka (δ Ori)
especially helium
B blue-white 11,000--30,000 Neutral helium, Spica (α Vir)
some hydrogen
A white 7500--11,000 Strong hydrogen, Sirius (α CMa)
some ionized
metals
F yellow-white 5900--7500 Hydrogen, ionized Canopus (α Car)
metals (e.g.,
calcium, iron)
G yellow 5200--5900 Neutral and ionized Sun, Capella (α Aur)
metals especially
ionized calcium
K orange 3900-5200 Neutral metals Aldebaran (α Tau)
M red-orange 2500--3900 Strong titanium Betelgeuse (α Ori)
oxide, some
neutral calcium
L red 1300--2500 Neutral potassium, Teide 1
rubidium, cesium,
metal hydrides
T red below 1300 Strong neutral Gliese 229B
potassium, some
water (H_2O)
References: FK-425;
CK-286, except that it does NOT have the brown dwarf types LT.
Form groups of 2 or 3---NOT more---and tackle Homework 20 problems 2--8 on photospheric temperature, spectral types, and the hydrogen Balmer lines.
Discuss each problem and come to a group answer.
Let's work for 5 or so minutes.
The winners get chocolates.
See Solutions 20.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/videos/ial_0000_standards.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/videos/ial_020_star2.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/art/art_c/chocolate_easter_bunny_2.html");?>
In understanding and modeling stars, it would be interesting to know if these parameters were related.
The data points would be just randomly scattered over the plot.
The other answers would give curves as illustrated in the figure above
(local link /
general link: function_behaviors_plot.html).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/mathematics/function_behaviors_plot.html");?>
Answer 4 is right.
We will look at several different
HR diagrams
below each of which highlights different features
of HR diagams.
A cartoon of an
HR diagram
is given in the figure below
(local link /
general link: star_hr_named_stars_cartoon.html)
that illustrates the general features of
HR diagrams.
Now let's look just below to a more elaborate
representative HR diagram---for
the sake of redundancy.
See the figure below
(local link /
general link: star_hr_named_stars.html).
As we have seen, the
HR diagram
is NOT an uncorrelated scatter diagram.
But it's NOT altogether simple either.
There are various groupings of stars in
luminosity-temperature/spectral-type space:
i.e., on the HR diagram.
Below we just list the main groupings that everyone should keep in mind when
discussing stars
and the HR diagram:
Here we are just being redundat with the discussion above for completeness in our list.
In the solar neighborhood and similar stellar neighborhoods---but
NOT all stellar neighborhoods---about 90 % of stars lie
on the main sequence
(FK-428).
As mentioned above,
main sequence stars
are those undergoing hydrogen burning
(i.e., nuclear burning of
hydrogen to
helium in their cores).
Typically a star spends about 90 % ????? of its
nuclear-burning life on the
main sequence---which
explains why main sequence stars
are the most abundant stars
undergoing nuclear burning.
They are NOT undergoing hydrogen burning
in their cores: they
are burning hydrogen and, perhaps, other elements in concentric shells about
a core which is perhaps burning some heavier element than those in the
burning shells.
They can have either hot or cool surfaces.
The cool ones emit primarily red light, and are called
red giants
or red supergiants.
In the solar neighborhood and similar stellar neighborhoods---but
NOT all stellar neighborhoods---about 1 % of stars are
giants or
supergiants
(FK-429).
But because they are so luminous, they are much more conspicuous than
their numbers indicate.
Many of the best known
naked-eye stars
are
giants or
supergiants:
e.g.,
Betelgeuse
(a red supergiants)
and Deneb
(a blue-white supergiants).
They are what is left when the all
nuclear burning has
stopped and a lot of mass has been ejected by
stellar winds and explosions.
They are or are NOT stars
depending on what you mean when you are discussing stars.
Though typically their masses are about 0.5 M_☉, they
are of order Earth-size: they are compact and super-dense.
They shine by residual heat or heat from continuing contraction.
In the solar neighborhood and similar stellar neighborhoods---but
NOT all stellar neighborhoods---about 9 % of stars are
white dwarfs
(FK-429).
Actually, because they can be very dim, there might be
more white dwarfs
around than we notice.
An HR diagram
for a large sample of stars is shown
in the figure below
(local link /
general link: star_hr_large_sample.html).
How one obtains stellar radii
approximately and contour lines
of constant radius
are explicated in the figure below
(local link /
general link: hr_radius.html).
In the figure below
(local link /
general link: betelgeuse.html)
is a resolved image of
Betelgeuse imaged by the
Hubble Space Telescope (HST).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_hr_named_stars_cartoon.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_hr_named_stars.html");?>
We will discuss the kinds of
stars further in subsequent
IALs:
Gravitational potential energy
is converted to heat energy as stars contract.
They just cool off forever.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_hr_large_sample.shtml");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/diagram/hr_radius.html");?>
Note that relatively close, very-large-radius stars
can be resolved with special techniques or instruments:
one still CANNOT
see a lot of detail, but at least the finite size of the star
in the image is NOT just the
diffraction pattern
of a point light source.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/betelgeuse.html");?>
There is also a luminosity class classification which is illustrated in the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram in the figure below (local link / general link: star_hr_lum.html).
Note the luminosity class are NOT determined by luminosity: they are determined by being bands on the HR diagram.
Note also that very often, we just conflate the expressions spectral type and luminosity class as spectral type.
For examples of full stellar classification, we can look back at Table: Stars of Highest Apparent Brightness.
And "you must remember this ...," the Sun is a G2 V star.
Form groups of 2 or 3---NOT more---and tackle
Homework 20
problems 10--16 on the
Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
and luminosity classes.
Discuss each problem and come to a group answer.
Let's work for 5 or so minutes.
The winners get chocolates.
See Solutions 20.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_hr_lum.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/art/art_c/chocolate_fountain_3.html");?>
Group Activity:
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/videos/ial_0000_standards.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/videos/ial_020_star2.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/art/art_c/chocolate_fountain_2.html");?>
Composition, rotation, and having a close binary companion are also important, but distinctly secondary.
There are other parameters, not controlling, that are important for star behavior at any point in time and in understanding and modeling it: most notably the aforementioned luminosity, photospheric temperature, and photospheric radius.
Answer 4 is right.
In fact, for an isolated star there is no observational way of determining its stellar mass.
But orbital parameters of gravitationally bound pairs of stars (binaries) allow mass to be determined using Newtonian physics and some information about the inclination angle of the binary.
The masses of all the main-sequence spectral types can be determined by examples in binaries: we expect the mass of a main-sequence spectral type to be an approximately fixed value usually.
Note the mass of a post-main-sequence spectral type probably has a range of values.
There is also a mass-luminosity relation for the main sequence. A cartoon of the mass-luminosity relation is shown in the figure below (local link / general link: mass_luminosity.html).
Recall
stellar mass
also enters the
main-sequence rule
which we reiterate in the figure below
(local link /
general link: hr_mass.html)
which shows the main-sequence star
stellar masses
on a cartoon of a
Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram.
Main-sequence lifetimes
are
functions
of stellar mass.
The functional behavior is illustrated in
the figure below
(local link /
general link: star_lifetimes.html).
The
initial mass function (IMF)
is the frequency of stars
as a function
stellar mass
at the time of their nearly
simultaneous birth (hence the word "initial") in
star formation regions.
The IMF
decreases at least for
stars more massive than about
1 M_☉ and probably
for stars
(which all have stellar mass
⪆ 0.08 M_☉ which
is the lower limit on
stellar mass).
The initial mass function (IMF)
is explicated in the figure below
(local link /
general link: initial_mass_function.html)
showing the
initial mass function (IMF).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/diagram/mass_luminosity.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/diagram/hr_mass.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_lifetimes.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/initial_mass_function.html");?>
But many stars are NOT relatively isolated.
Let's consider these physical star groups---starting with binaries and then larger physical groupings of stars: e.g., gravitationally bound or gravitationally interacting groups. For the smaller groupings (i.e., those below the scale of galaxies and NOT including stellar association), see the figure below (local link / general link: binary_cluster.html).
Binaries
(i.e., gravitationally bound pairs of stars) are
a whole massive subject in themselves---but we will just give the short story.
The stars in a
binary
orbit their mutual
center of mass
in elliptical orbits
as shown in the figure below.
Credit/Permission: ©
David Jeffery,
2005 / Own work.
Image link: Itself.
We will just mention why
binaries are important:
In the solar neighborhood---which may be representative of
observable universe
as a whole---about 2/3 of all stars
are in binaries.
Thus,
binaries
are as common as singles (i.e., single stars).
Why are they numerous?
Some feature of star formation
since virtually all binary pair stars
form as binaries at the same time.
Binary systems
from gravitational capture are very rare and cosmically insignificant.
Mass determinations are particularly important since they allow
the masses of all
spectral types to fixed.
Mass is a basic parameter in understanding and modeling stars.
This importance is an importance to our understanding NOT an importance to
universe.
Thus, binaries
can show behaviors singles never can.
These behaviors are sometimes cosmically important: e.g.,
some kinds of
supernovae
happen only in or nearly only in
close binaries.
For a close binary
(which is also an
eclipsing binary),
see the figure below
(local link /
general link: star_binary_eclipsing.html).
Multiple star systems
are systems of 3 or more gravitationally
bound stars with complex orbits.
The 3-star systems are naturally called
triple star systems.
Multiple star systems are
much rarer ??? than binary star systems
and become rarer with increasing multiplicity. ???
Open clusters
of stars are explicated
in the figure below
(local link /
general link: pleiades_open_cluster.html).
First, locate Orion
and Sirius
(the brightest star in the sky) off to the lower left
of Orion
(south-east on the sky).
A line from Sirius
though the belt of Orion
and then through
the bright orangy Aldebaran
(the eye of
Taurus
leads pretty
much to the
Pleiades---a
distinct close little group of six or more naked-eye
stars---there
are at least 1000 stars altogether in the cluster recall.
The method is illustrated for northern
constellations in the
winter
sky map
in the figure below
(local link /
general link: sky_map_winter.html).
Stellar associations
are structures of a few to a few hundred stars
and span of
order 10 to 100 pc
(HI-393,395).
They are generally gravitationally UNBOUND though
gravitationally interacting and moving together
(FK-456).
The kinetic energy of the stars and
gravitational perturbations
will break them up within a few 10s
of millions of
years.
In the Milky Way, they
are only in the
Galactic disk.
The most discussed kind of
stellar associations
are the
OB associations
which are stellar associations
containing of order 10--100
hot (and therefore bluish),
young OB stars.
Globular clusters
are explicated the figure below
(local link /
general link: globular_cluster.html).
Galaxies,
galaxy clusters,
galaxy superclusters,
and the large-scale structure of the universe:
These are all large groupings of stars
that we will take up in:
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/cluster/binary_cluster.html");?>
Caption:
Binaries and
binary
orbits
(FK-435).
The figure below
(local link /
general link: orbit_elliptical_explication.html)
shows animations
of binary star orbits.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/orbit/orbit_elliptical_explication.html");?>
In a binary, usually the brighter star is
called the primary
and the other star, the secondary.
Sometimes, primary means most
massive and secondary least massive.
Usually, the two meanings for primary
and secondary give the same
stars, but NOT always.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_binary_eclipsing.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/pleiades_open_cluster.html");?>
Probably the best known example of an
open cluster
is the
Pleiades
in constellation
Taurus.
For more on the Pleiades,
see the figure below
(local link /
general link: pleiades.html).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/pleiades.html");?>
To find the
Pleiades,
one can use the constellations as SKYMARKS
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/sky_map/sky_map_winter.html");?>
The line between
open clusters
and
associations
is probably NOT sharp.
Open clusters
are a bit more compact with
of order 100 to 1000 stars with a size scales of order 4 to 20 pc
(HI-392--393), and so
are more definitely gravitationally bound.
The stars in an
stellar association
formed at about the same time (i.e., same time to within
a few million or tens of millions of years:
HI-338) in a
star formation region.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/globular_cluster.html");?>
These are relatively young and metal-rich stars:
Their metalliticities are typically in the range ∼ 1--4 % ???? by mass fraction with lower limit ∼ 0.6 % ???? (see Table: Stellar Population Metallicity for the Milky Way: also shown below: local link / general link: cosmic_composition_table.html).
Population I stars are found mainly in the galactic disks and galactic bulges, but much NOT in galactic halos of spiral galaxies.
They are NOT much found in elliptical galaxies.
We will discuss disks, bulges, and halos of galaxies later in IAL 27: The Milky Way and IAL 28: Galaxies, but as a preview we discuss galaxies a bit in the figure below (local link / general link: galaxy_sombrero.html).
These are relatively old and metal-poor stars:
Their metalliticities by mass fraction
are typically of order 0.001 (or 0.1 %), but
in extreme cases are ≤ ∼ 10**(-6) as for
Caffau's star---see the
figure below
(local link /
general link: star_caffau.html).
In elliptical galaxies, most of the
stars are
Population II stars
(see Characteristics of Galaxies).
Population III stars
are as-yet-unobserved nearly zero-metallicity
stars formed in the first age of
star formation
after the Big Bang:
they were the first generation of stars.
Their only metal
is lithium-7 (Li-7)
(the only metal
produced in Big Bang nucleosynthesis)
at mass fraction
∼ 10**(-9).
They should all be ∼ 13.5 Gyr old.
As aforesaid, they have never been observed.
In the modern universe, they must either be very rare or
nonexistent. Note:
For the
James Webb Space Telescope
(JWST, 2021--2041?, diameter = 6.5 m, 18 segment mirrors of gold-plated beryllium) and its design,
see the figure below
(local link /
general link: telescope_segmented_mirror.html).
The insert below
(local link /
general link: cosmic_composition_table.html)
shows
Table: Cosmic Composition
which summarizes
cosmic composition
and
Table: Stellar Population Metallicity for the Milky Way
which summarizes
stellar populations.
Why is there varying metalliticity with star age?
As we will discuss in subsequent lectures, stars synthesize
metals in their
nuclear burning lifetimes and
eject those into interstellar medium (ISM)
either through
stellar winds
(mostly
post-main-sequence stellar winds)
or as
supernovae.
Out of the ISM,
new generations of stars form as is discussed in
IAL 21: Star Formation.
Thus, every new generation of stars has higher
metalliticity
(higher abundance of metals)
on average than the generation before---if the
galaxies were like closed-boxes.
Actually, they are NOT like closed-boxes.
There is inflow of intergalactic gas
which has nearly primordial composition and outflow
of interstellar medium (ISM).
The upshot is that the metalliticity
of stars has saturated at ∼ 1--4 % ????
(see
Table: Stellar Population Metallicity for the Milky Way:
also shown above:
local link /
general link: cosmic_composition_table.html)
for probably billions of years into the future
(see
David Weinberg 2016, "On the Deuterium-to-Hydrogen Ratio of the Interstellar Medium", p. 3, but this NOT the best reference---but where is that mythical beast).
Because stars have vastly varying lifetimes, some old,
metal-poor
stars persist on and overlap with younger,
metal-richer stars.
Thus, there are very old, very metal-poor
stars today: e.g.,
stars in globular clusters
have calculated ages of about 12.5 Gyr
(FK-638) as we mentioned above.
Old stars are necessarily small stars.
Recall the more massive a star is the faster it runs through all of the stages of its
nuclear burning lifetime.
Population II stars
are probably mostly less massive than the Sun.
Therefore, their colors must be mostly red or yellow.
Massive hot main-sequence stars
(OB stars)
are blue or blue-white and go through their lifetimes quickly.
First, metalliticity does form a continuum
and I think the terms
Population I stars
and
Population II stars,
are used a bit loosely.
There are probably different conventions on the dividing line
between Population I stars
and
Population II stars,
but
one is ∼ 0.006 = 0.6 %
(see
Table: Stellar Population Metallicity for the Milky Way:
also shown above:
local link /
general link: cosmic_composition_table.html).
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/galaxies/galaxy_sombrero.html");?>
Their ages range from 11 to 13.5 or so Gyr
(see
Table: Stellar Population Metallicity for the Milky Way:
also shown below:
local link /
general link: cosmic_composition_table.html).
In spiral galaxies,
Population II stars
are found mainly in the
galactic halos
(most notably
globular clusters
in galactic halos) and
galactic bulges with only
a small fraction in galactic disks.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_caffau.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/telescope/telescope_segmented_mirror.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/cosmol/cosmic_composition_table.html");?>
Question:
Can there really be a sharp dichotomy between
Population I stars
and
Population II stars?
I think answers 2 and 3 are right.
Form groups of 2 or 3---NOT more---and tackle Homework 20 problems 19--26 on binaries, open clusters, globular clusters, stellar associations, and stellar populations.
Discuss each problem and come to a group answer.
Let's work for 5 or so minutes.
The winners get chocolates.
See Solutions 20.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/videos/ial_0000_standards.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/videos/ial_020_star2.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/art/art_c/chocolate_hot_2.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/star/star_modeling.html");?>