In class, we explicate structure formation using illustrative videos, and so in class we skip far down to feature Structure Formation in Videos.
Features:
Note, the cartoon inlcudes the inflation era (cosmic time ∼ 10**(-36)--10**(-33) or 10**(-32) s from fiducial time zero of standard Friedmann equation models), Big Bang nucleosynthesis era (cosmic time ∼ 10--1200 s ≅ 0.17--20 m), and the subsequent evolution of the observable universe according to the Λ-CDM model or some replacement cosmological model (which must be rather close to the Λ-CDM model in most observable effects).
Note, the initial baryonic matter was created by Big Bang nucleosynthesis (cosmic time ∼ 10--1200 s ≅ 0.17--20 m) and the primordial cosmic composition (which is also almost cosmic present intergalactic medium composition: fiducial values by mass fraction: 0.75 H, 0.25 He-4, 0.001 D, 0.0001 He-3, 10**(-9) Li-7).
The size of the primordial density fluctuations is known by a combination of theory (i.e., inflation) and observation (i.e., the cosmic microwave background (CMB, T = 2.72548(57) K (Fixsen 2009))) (see Wikipedia: Structure formation: Before the first structures).????
It is a case of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.
The higher density primordial density fluctuations collapse under their self-gravity to became gravitationally bound systems.
The lower density primordial density fluctuations to became sitll lower in relative density and the lowest ones evolved to becoming cosmic voids: regions of relative low density.
Note, the density between gravitationally bound systems was declining in general because of the overall expansion of the universe. The universal expansion is a major background effect opposing the clumping of the matter. It must be considered a given in all our discussions as it is in all calculations of the large-scale structure.
So the gravitationally bound systems were mostly dark matter and we call these dark matter halos. A whole distribution of sizes of dark matter halos form initially, many of which subsequently merged to make larger dark matter halos.
Note, we do NOT see dark matter (so far), except through its gravitational effect on baryonic matter which we do see in emitted electromagnetic radiation (EMR).
"Cold" in this context means moving slow relative to the vacuum light speed c = 2.99792458*10**5 km/s ≅ 3*10**5 km/s: i.e., at nonrelativistic velocities relative to the local comoving frames (see frame_hierarchy_astro.html: Comoving Frames).
Cold dark matter is needed to get the clumping properties needed for the observed large-scale structure.
Without cold dark matter, the baryonic matter would probably still clump to form stars as we know them, but galaxies and the rest of large-scale structure would look very different from what we see.
Note, there MAY be exotic hot dark matter (dark matter moving at relativistic velocities) and warm dark matter (at intermediate velocities), but these dark matter forms can only be of secondary importance in structure formation.
Actually, neutrinos forming the cosmic neutrino background (a relic of the Big Bang from before Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN)) were originally a form of hot dark matter, but they lost kinetic energy in a manner similar to that of cosmologically redshifting photons and became a minor contribution to cold dark matter.
Note, baryonic matter is ordinary ordinary matter made of protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Recall, the initial baryonic matter was created by Big Bang nucleosynthesis (cosmic time ∼ 10--1200 s ≅ 0.17--20 m) and the primordial cosmic composition (which is also almost cosmic present intergalactic medium composition: fiducial values by mass fraction: 0.75 H, 0.25 He-4, 0.001 D, 0.0001 He-3, 10**(-9) Li-7).
Since then interstellar medium (ISM) has been enriched in metallicity (Z). In the modern/local observable universe is cosmic composition (meaning inside modern galaxies: fiducial values by mass fraction: 0.73 H, 0.25 He-4, ∼ 0.02 metals). The evolution of metallicity (Z) is discussed in Cosmology file: metallicity_evolution.html.
The 1st order calculations are N-body simulations (which we discuss in features below) which include only dark matter which makes up ∼ 26 % of the mass-energy of the observable universe and ∼ 85 % of the CLUMPABLE mass-energy.
The dark energy makes up ∼ 74 % of the mass-energy of the observable universe, but it is thought NOT to clump.
In fact, in N-body simulations the particles are modeled as point masses which CANNOT hit each other in a body-on-body sense.
Such N-body simulations in the context of the Λ-CDM model (the current standard cosmological model (c.1995--): Scott 2018) have always done a good 1st order job in reproducing the statistical properties of the observed large-scale structure. Note, the Λ-CDM model fits the observable universe so well overall, that any replacement cosmological model will have to have similar properties to the Λ-CDM model for the calculation of the large-scale structure.
See N-body simulation videos below in feature Structure Formation in Videos (local link / general link: n_body_videos.html).
An abbreviated recapitulation of the explication of the present insert (i.e., Cosmology file: large_scale_structure_formation_outline.html) is given in the figure below (local link / general link: large_scale_structure_formation_cube.html).
So N-body simulations
though extremely useful in understanding much
structure formation
are NOT adequate to
to give us the actual existing
large-scale structure
even for dark matter ALONE.
Note, the pressure forces
include
ideal gas law pressure,
radiation pressure,
and
magnetic pressure
(which if nothing else helps to launch
relativistic bipolar jets
from central supermassive black hole,
and thus provides AGN feedback
to structure formation).
The situation gets worse than just
pressure forces.
Baryonic matter
will collapse to form SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURE:
stars,
galaxies,
supernovae (SNe)
compact objects
(i.e., small white dwarfs
neutron stars,
stellar mass black holes),
supermassive black holes (SMBHs)
and active galaxy nuclei (AGNs)
(which are powered by
supermassive black holes (SMBHs)).
Dealing with SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURE requires
subgrid modeling
(e.g.,
Google: What is subgrid modeling?;
Wikipedia:
Turbulencesubgrid-scale modeling).
Subgrid modeling means that you use approximate prescriptions to deal
behaviors smaller than your computational grid.
In structure formation,
subgrid modeling is now very advanced, but
there is an unknown amount of improvement needed to completely adequately account for all
large-scale structure.
Why do we need to deal with SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURE?
An example of calculated result used to compare an observable is the
calculated light emitted by
the large-scale structure
near cosmic noon ∼ 3.8 Gyr (lookback time ∼ 10 Gyr,
z ∼ 2) which is illustrated
in the figure below
(local link /
general link: large_scale_structure_cosmic_noon.html).
For formation of the
first stars
and galaxies is called
cosmic dawn
(AKA reionization era, z∼6--20, cosmic time ∼ 150 Myr--1 Gyr in the Λ-CDM model).
The period between
recombination era t = 377,770(3200) Jyr
= 1.192*10**13 s (z = 1089.80(21))
(where the
cosmic microwave background (CMB, T = 2.72548(57) K (Fixsen 2009))
formed an cosmic dawn is
called the cosmic dark age (∼ 377 kyr (z ≅ 1100) -- ∼ 150 Myr (z ≅ 20)).
The galaxies
themselves became organized in the larger
large-scale structure: i.e.,
the
cosmic web
consisting of galaxies
galaxy groups (⪅ 50 large galaxies),
galaxy clusters (⪆ 50 large galaxies),
galaxy superclusters,
galaxy filaments,
galaxy walls,
and cosmic voids.
Galaxies NOT
in galaxy groups
and galaxy clusters
are called field galaxies.
Note,
galaxies,
galaxy groups,
and galaxy clusters
are usually
gravitationally bound systems.
The other structures listed above are usually NOT
gravitationally bound systems.
Note also,
large-scale structure
is usually taken to mean the actual existing
large-scale structure
as opposed to many hypothetical
large-scale structures.
In the first meaning,
large-scale structures
is virtually
synonym for
cosmic web
which is just used primarily to emphasize the things
(galaxies,
etc.) that make up the
cosmic web.
The statistics
for dwarf galaxies are much less certain
and will probably be continually revised for a long time to come.
The most basic
morphological classification
for large
galaxies
is the Hubble sequence
(see Galaxies file:
galaxy_hubble_sequence.html).
A extension of the
Hubble sequence is the
de Vaucouleurs system
(see Galaxies file:
galaxy_vaucouleurs.html).
Reproducing all the observed
galaxy types
with the correct statistical distribution is one of the ultimate goals
of structure formation
computer simulations.
Great progress has been made toward this
ultimate goal.
We are trying to calculate simulated
large-scale structure
that has the SAME statistical properties as that of the (observed)
large-scale structure:
e.g., same average number of
galaxies of each type
per unit volume,
same average number of
galaxy clusters
per unit volume, etc.
Why CAN'T we calculate
our observable universe?
The exact
primordial density
fluctuations
from Big Bang era
in the observable universe
CANNOT be completely known.
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) T = 2.7260(13) K
gives information on the
surface of last scattering:
i.e., the sphere surrounding us from
which the
CMB photons
that actually reach us last scattered on their radial paths to us.
For the rest of the
locations in the observable universe,
we have to assume a distribution of
primordial density
fluctuations
inferred from what the
CMB
and inflation.
Of course,
a computer simulation
of structure formation
starts from a particular set of simulated
primordial density
fluctuations,
but that set is just drawn randomly from the assumed
distribution of
primordial density
fluctuations.
Circa 2025,
trhere is NO reason to believe that we will NOT
eventually match the
statistical properties of the
observable universe
to high accuracy provided
we can the right
overall cosmological model.
Do we have it now.
Probably NOT, at least NOT exactly.
See the next feature.
There are some tensions between
structure formation
computer simulations
and observations, but
NO falsifications currently.
Digression on jargon:
A falsification
is a discrepancy between
theory
and observation sufficiently large that one judges the
theory to be wrong.
A tension
is a discrepancy that does NOT cause one to judge the
theory as wrong.
The discrepancy may be due
uncertainties
in the observations or in the application of the
theory.
Tensions
suggest there might be a problem with a
theory, but more work is
needed to show if that is true.
More work hopefully will cause the tensions
to go away OR turn them into
falsifications.
Either way, progress.
However,
the Λ-CDM model
fits many observations so well that it must approximate any replacement
cosmological model very closely.
This suggests that
structure formation
our understanding and calculations will NOT change very much
with any replacement
cosmological model.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/cosmol/large_scale_structure_keywords.html");?>
Structure formation
(i.e., the formation of the
large scale structure
of the observable universe)
is can be discussed while explicating illustrative videos:
first
N-body simulation videos,
second
Large-Scale structure of the universe videos.
See also
Cosmology file:
n_body_videos.html
and
Cosmology file:
large_scale_structure_videos.html.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/cosmol/large_scale_structure_formation_cube.html");?>
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/cosmol/large_scale_structure_cosmic_noon.html");?>
EOF
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/cosmol/n_body_videos.html");?>
EOF
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/cosmol/large_scale_structure_videos.html");?>