Caption: A cartoon of the divergence of density parameter Ω(t) from 1 for FE models with cosmological constant (AKA Lambda, Λ) set to zero: i.e., Friedmann-equation Λ=0 models.
Note density parameter Ω(t) = 1 gives a flat universe: i.e., a universe where space has Euclidean geometry (AKA flat space geometry).
The cartoon illustrates the flatness problem which we explicate below.
Features:
|Ω - 1| = ∝ t**(2/3)where t is cosmic time for the growth of the divergence for the "matter" dominated era using of solution of the Einstein-de Sitter universe (1932, standard model of cosmology c.1960s--c.1990s) as an approximation (Li-102). We then find
|Ω - 1|_("matter" dominated era begins = 50 Kyr) ≅ (50 kyr/10 Gyr)**(2/3) |Ω - 1|_("matter" dominated era ends = 10 Gyr) ≅ (150*10**10 s/30*10**16 s)**(2/3) |Ω - 1|_("matter" dominated era ends) ≅ 3*10**(-4) |Ω - 1|_("matter" dominated era ends) .Now |Ω - 1|_("matter" dominated era ends) ⪅ 5*10**(-4) where the last value is estimated from the probably best cosmic present value |Omega-1| = 0.0005(40) (which is consistent with zero within 1 standard deviation (1 σ)) (Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck 2018, p. 31). The upshot is that |Ω - 1|_("matter" dominated era begins) ⪅ 1.5*10**(-7) which is a very tiny value.
At early cosmic times, |Ω - 1| was even tinier. If one runs the Friedmann-equation Λ=0 models back to the Planck time t_plank = sqrt(ħG/c**5) = 5.39125*10**(-44) s, one finds
|Ω - 1| ≅ 10**(-60)(CL-155).
How could the observable universe be so flat back then? The flatness seems to be fine-tuned.
One solution is that the observable universe was exactly flat as an initial condition.
But then why that initial condition?
The inflation super rapid exponential expansion causes any curvature term in the Friedmann equation to be reduced to extreme tininess.
In fact, the inflation paradigm predicts |Ω - 1| ⪅ 10**(-5) which is consistent with the current value |Omega-1| = 0.0005(40). (CL-155).
This prediction for Omega was made back in the early 1980s when the observed Omega was only ∼ 0.3. Only since circa 2000 has the observed Omega come close to 1.
It is impressive that inflation predicted the modern result before it was observed.
It will be interesting to see if the error of the observed Omega can be further reduced and then if the agreement with inflation will still persist.
But improving on the current Omega value with it 0.4 % error will be very difficult.