Caption: Click on the Alien image to see an illustration of the twins paradox, an illustration of the time dilation effect of special relativity.
Features:
The astronaut twin notices NO time funniness in their reference frame (which is NOT a true inertial frame when there is acceleration). It is only by comparing their time flow to time flow in other reference frames that funniness is observed.
Time does flow at different rates in different reference frames. This is the time dilation effect.
So shouldn't both twins have aged less? Isn't everything relative? This is a paradox.
The Earthbound twin did NOT accelerate very much relative to inertial frames. They did accelerate a little since the Earth's rotation relative to the observable universe is an accelerated motion in the celestial frame (CEF) of the Earth.
Actually, all moving clocks run slow. This point is explicated in some detail in file Relativity file: time_dilation_animation.html.
In fact, in this experiment both the special relativity effect (called time dilation) and the general relativity effect (called gravitational time dilation) have to be accounted for. But the results agree with the predictions within uncertainty.
Thus, special relativity and general relativity do play roles in modern everyday life even if most people do NOT know it.
But special relativity forbids backward time travel (i.e., time travel to the past). Actually, forbidding time travel to the past is an extra minor of postulate deemed necessary since time travel to the past was deemed impossible since it is never seen and presents paradoxes that only scifi can solve. This postulate causes vacuum light speed to be the highest physical velocity (i.e., the highest velocity that information or any effect can propagate relative to a local inertial frame).
It's disappointing to scifi fans, but nature needs not backward time travel. So those time travel classics The Time Machine (1895), By His Bootrtaps (1941), etc. are just voyages of the imagination. See Wikipedia: List of time travel works of fiction.
Of course, you can replicate the past locally to some fidelity. We do this all the time when we remember.