This is yours truly's broad definition of emergence.
It's a bit idiosyncratic, but yours truly thinks it's a useful perspective on emergence.
So yours truly is idiosyncratic---so was Job:
To explicate the broad definition:
For example, classical mechanics (AKA Newtonian physics) can be derived rigorously from theory of relativity (which includes general relativity and special relativity) by going to the classical limit. So in one sense, classical mechanics is limit-form special case of theory of relativity.
But classical mechanics was originally discovered long before the theory of relativity, and so is in a historical and conceptual sense independent of the theory of relativity.
Without rigorous proof, yours truly will assume all important theories are emergent theories and will usually call them theories and NOT emergent theories. Yours truly tends to call important theories emergent theories when yours truly wishes to emphasize the emergence.
The
narrow definition
uses he word "emergence" in the opposite sense:
emergence from an underlying system.
In fact, they two definitions
seem to yours truly to be different perspectives on
nearly the same thing.
The only emergent theory
included in the
broad definition
and excluded under the
narrow definition
seems to be the fundamental fundamental physics theory which
yours truly calls
TOE-Plus---the "Plus" means that
TOE-Plus includes things NOT
usually included in the
theory of everything (TOE), but
included in physics---most importantly
the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
We do NOT have
TOE-Plus yet, but we might
someday, maybe soon, maybe NOT soon.
In philosophy,
systems theory,
science, and
art,
emergence is a
process whereby larger entities, patterns, and regularities arise through
interactions among smaller or simpler entities that themselves do NOT exhibit such properties.
php require("/home/jeffery/public_html/astro/art/pegasus.html");?>