Newton's cannonball
(thought up by Isaac Newton (1643--1727)
himself)
illustrates how to get to orbit
Put a giant mountain he Earth and put a cannon on it and fire horizontally.
For low muzzle velocity, the cannonball follows parabolic path just as it should
near the Earth's surface in the absence of air drag.
But fire faster and faster and eventually the cannonball goes into a low-Earth circular
orbit.
It keeps missing the Earth.
Fire faster and it goes into
elliptical orbit.
An ellipse has definite
geometrical shape, it's NOT just an oval.
There is formula.
Fire faster still and eventually, the cannonball will have escape velocity
and will go to infinity on an
a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit#Orbital_energies_and_orbit_shapes">escape orbit
However, if you say orbit without qualification, you usually mean a bound orbit where the astro-bodies cannot go off to infinity, but stay within the upper limit distance from each other.
But for a sufficiently symmetric body it is the geometrical center.
When you hang/balance a resting object, it's the point directly above/below the pivot point.
It is with respect to the observable universe (i.e., bulk mass of the observable universe). So there is a sort of absolute rotation.
This understanding is a modern one based general relativity, and so unkown to Newton and every one before the advent of general relativity in 1915. But not knowing general relativity did not prevent Newton everyone up to 1915 for doing celestial mechanics correctly with their then understanding.
All physical laws are specified relative to inertial frame, except general relativity which gave us our modern understanding.
When you want to apply a you reference it to sufficiently inertial frame.
Now the Earth is in free fall, and so reference frame attached to the Earth unrotating relative to the observable universe AND unaccelerated relative to the Earth is inertial frame.
But on the Earth's surface, we are rotating and yet we apply Newtonian physics everywhere on the Earth's surface.
In fact, there are non-inertial frame effects everywhere, but they too small to notice on the small scale without special observations, but they do affect weather: cyclones and anticyclones.
The correction for non-inertial frame effects are called inertial forces (e.g., the centrifugal force and the Coriolis force).
In dealing with gravitationally-bound systems of astro-bodies, people usually choose to the their mutual center of mass as the origin for the systems. I call these center-of-mass frames.
Newtonian physics dictates that the internal gravitation cannot affect the center of mass motion. But the internal gravitation certainly affects the motion of the astro-bodies.
If the EXTERNAL gravitation is sufficiently uniform it only affects the center of mass motion.
If it is not sufficiently uniform, then it does affect the internal motion by what are called tidal forces which on Earth cause the tides due to the EXTERNAL gravitation of the Moon and Sun.
The less the bound systems of astro-bodies are affected by tidal forces the more easily they form and persist, and we identify them as planet-moon systems, planetary system, multiple-star systems, star clusters, galaxies, and galaxies. They form a hierarchy of center-of-mass frames.
Below, we look the hierarchy.
Caption:
A diagram of a
gravitational 2-body system
with the spherically-symmetric bodies
orbiting
in elliptical orbits
the system
center of mass
marked by a red cross.
The center of mass is, of course,
at rest in the
center-of-mass (CM)
inertial frame defined by
the gravitational 2-body system.
The center of mass is also the
common focus
of the elliptical orbits.
The other focuses
for the elliptical orbits
are just empty points in
physical space with NO
special significance.
Features:
The two kinds of
apsides are
periapsis
and apoapsis.
A physical fact for orbits
is that astro-bodies
move slowest at apoapsis
and fastest at
periapsis.
A relative orbit is also
an elliptical orbit
if the non-relative orbit is.
You will have imagine the
relative orbit since it is NOT
shown in the
diagram.
where r_periapsis is the
periapsis separation
and r_apoapsis is the
apoapsis separation.
where e is the
eccentricity
of the relative elliptical orbit.
where 1 is the index for astro-body 1,
2 is the index for astro-body 2,
r is the relative separation distance,
and m = m_1+m_2 is the total mass.
As you can see, if m_1 >> m_2, we have r_1 ≅ 0 and r_2 ≅ r.
This just shows that if m_1 >> m_2, we effectively have
astro-body 2
orbiting
astro-body 1 which is
effectively at rest at the
center of mass.
Other than the example cases, if one wants a fancy name,
yours truly suggests just you prefix the name by peri- or ap-: e.g.,
peri-Jupiter
and ap-Jupiter.
Credit/Permission: ©
Tom Ruen (AKA User:Tomruen),
2016 /
CC BY-SA 4.0.
r_mean = (1/2)( r_periapsis + r_apoapsis ),
r_periapsis = r_mean*(1 - e) and r_apoapsis = r_mean*(1 + e) ,
r_1 = r*(m_2/m) and r_2 = r*(m_1/m) ,
Image link: Wikimedia Commons:
File:Periapsis apoapsis.png.
Local file: local link: orbit_.html.
File: Orbit file:
orbit_apsis.html.