Newton's cannonball
(thought up by Isaac Newton (1643--1727)
himself)
illustrates how to get to orbit
Put a giant mountain he Earth and put a cannon on it and fire horizontally.
For low muzzle velocity, the cannonball follows parabolic path just as it should
near the Earth's surface in the absence of air drag.
But fire faster and faster and eventually the cannonball goes into a low-Earth circular
orbit.
It keeps missing the Earth.
Fire faster and it goes into
elliptical orbit.
An ellipse has definite
geometrical shape, it's NOT just an oval.
There is formula.
Fire faster still and eventually, the cannonball will have escape velocity
and will go to infinity on an
a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit#Orbital_energies_and_orbit_shapes">escape orbit
However, if you say orbit
without qualification, you usually mean a
bound orbit
where the astro-bodies
cannot go off to infinity, but stay within the upper limit distance from each other.
But for a sufficiently symmetric body it is the geometrical center.
When you hang/balance a resting object, it's the point
directly above/below the pivot point.
It is with respect to the
observable universe (i.e.,
bulk mass of the
observable universe).
So there is a sort of absolute rotation.
This understanding is a modern one based
general relativity,
and so unkown to
Newton and every one before the advent of
general relativity
in 1915.
But not knowing
general relativity
did not prevent
Newton everyone up to 1915 for doing
celestial mechanics
correctly with their then understanding.
All physical laws
are specified relative to
inertial frame,
except
general relativity
which gave us our modern understanding.
When you want to apply a you reference it to sufficiently
inertial frame.
Now the Earth
is in free fall,
and so
reference frame attached to the
Earth unrotating
relative to the observable universe AND
unaccelerated relative to the Earth
is inertial frame.
But on the Earth's surface, we are rotating
and yet we apply
Newtonian physics
everywhere on the Earth's surface.
In fact, there are non-inertial frame effects everywhere, but
they too small to notice on the small scale without special observations, but they
do affect weather: cyclones and anticyclones.
The correction for
non-inertial frame effects are called
inertial forces
(e.g., the centrifugal force
and the Coriolis force).
In dealing with
gravitationally-bound systems of
astro-bodies,
people usually choose to the
their mutual center of mass as the origin
for the systems.
I call these
center-of-mass frames.
Newtonian physics
dictates that the internal
gravitation
cannot affect the center of mass motion.
But the internal
gravitation
certainly affects the motion
of the astro-bodies.
If the EXTERNAL gravitation
is sufficiently uniform it only affects the center of mass motion.
If it is not sufficiently uniform,
then it does affect the
internal motion by what are called
tidal forces
which on Earth cause the tides due to the
EXTERNAL gravitation
of the Moon and
Sun.
The less the bound systems of astro-bodies
are affected by
tidal forces
the more easily they form and persist, and we
identify them as
planet-moon systems,
planetary system,
multiple-star systems,
star clusters,
galaxies,
and galaxies.
They form a hierarchy of
center-of-mass frames.
Below, we look the hierarchy.
Caption:
A diagram of a
gravitational 2-body system
with the spherically-symmetric bodies
orbiting
in elliptical orbits
the system
center of mass
marked by a red cross.
The center of mass is, of course,
at rest in the
center-of-mass (CM)
inertial frame defined by
the gravitational 2-body system.
The center of mass is also the
common focus
of the elliptical orbits.
The other focuses
for the elliptical orbits
are just empty points in
physical space with NO
special significance.
Features:
The two kinds of
apsides are
periapsis
and apoapsis.
A physical fact for orbits
is that astro-bodies
move slowest at apoapsis
and fastest at
periapsis.
A relative orbit is also
an elliptical orbit
if the non-relative orbit is.
You will have imagine the
relative orbit since it is NOT
shown in the
diagram.
where r_periapsis is the
periapsis separation
and r_apoapsis is the
apoapsis separation.
where e is the
eccentricity
of the relative elliptical orbit.
where 1 is the index for astro-body 1,
2 is the index for astro-body 2,
r is the relative separation distance,
and m = m_1+m_2 is the total mass.
As you can see, if m_1 >> m_2, we have r_1 ≅ 0 and r_2 ≅ r.
This just shows that if m_1 >> m_2, we effectively have
astro-body 2
orbiting
astro-body 1 which is
effectively at rest at the
center of mass.
Other than the example cases, if one wants a fancy name,
yours truly suggests just you prefix the name by peri- or ap-: e.g.,
peri-Jupiter
and ap-Jupiter.
orbit
what is point is actually being orbited and with respect to what reference?
Credit/Permission: ©
Tom Ruen (AKA User:Tomruen),
2016 /
CC BY-SA 4.0.
r_mean = (1/2)( r_periapsis + r_apoapsis ),
r_periapsis = r_mean*(1 - e) and r_apoapsis = r_mean*(1 + e) ,
r_1 = r*(m_2/m) and r_2 = r*(m_1/m) ,
Image link: Wikimedia Commons:
File:Periapsis apoapsis.png.
Local file: local link: orbit_.html.
File: Orbit file:
orbit_apsis.html.