Image 1 Caption: A diagram of spherically symmetric sphere of fluid in hydrostatic equilibrium which in this context means all fluid parcels are at rest (relative to an inertial frame).
Features:
For hydrostatic equilibrium (i.e., balance of forces), we find that
p_out*A = mg + p_in*A p_out = (m/A)g + p_in p_out = ρg*dr + p_in (dp/dr) = -ρg ,where dr is the thickness of the layer and ρ is the layer density and (dp/dr) is the pressure gradient---which is negative meaning that pressure decreases going outward. Note, the pressure outward at any spherical shell must support all the mass above the spherical shell, and so pressure increase going inward.
Actually, one has should prove that the hydrostatic equilibrium spherically symmetric sphere is stable: i.e., that vanishingly small perturbations damp out and do NOT cause progressive change to some other structure. We do prove this below actually.
Why?
Fluids have very low resistance to shearing forces. The ideal limit of an inviscid fluid (one that has NO viscosity: which is the resistance to shearing forces) has NO resistance at all. But, in fact, as we discuss below, some resistance to shearing forces are needed to make an arbitrary initial clump of fluid relax to a state of hydrostatic equilibrium.
A pair of shearing forces are parallel, but do NOT act along the same line. Thus, they can cause layers of a body to slide relative to each other.
In the case of any initial clump of fluid acted on by self-gravity and pressure acting in combination as shearing forces, fluid parcels will keep moving around until they CANNOT anymore---which is when the clump has relaxed to the self-consistent solution---where there are NO shearing forces acting and NO kinetic energy---which solution is just the hydrostatic equilibrium sphere.
Note, kinetic energy is always being lost due to viscosity (which is the resistance to shearing forces as noted above) which eventually dissipates all the kinetic energy into waste heat.
In astrophysical contexts, the waste heat will usually be radiated away as electromagnetic radiation (EMR).
The fact that self-gravity, pressure, and viscosity always move the clump toward hydrostatic equilibrium sphere proves that that structure is stable. Any perturbation is damped out by the aforesaid self-gravity, pressure, and viscosity.
Note, without some viscosity, there is NO way to dissipate kinetic energy and the clump of fluid will slosh around perpetually and NEVER reach hydrostatic equilibrium.
What if the clump of fluid initially had some angular momentum? This angular momentum will be conserved and the clump will relax to ideally to a uniformly rotating hydrostatic equilibrium oblate spheroid where only the self-gravity, pressure, and centrifugal force are acting. Note, there will also be rotational kinetic energy in the final state in this case.
In the astrophysical realm, the astro-bodies virtually always start formation with some angular momentum, and so virtually always at all stages in existence have some kind of average rotation, unless some process removes all angular momentum, but this virtually NEVER happens.
Only the pressure force is strong enough to resist sufficiently strong self-gravity. Atoms strongly resist being compressed.
But note the pressure force does NOT resist shearing forces.
So when the pressure force and gravity balance on every small bit of matter flow will essentially stop just described in general above.
Then one has spherically symmetric sphere self-consistent solution.
Well this depends on chemical composition, heat energy content, and rotation.
However, observations suggest the empirical rule that the size scale for a rocky astro-body must be >∼ 600 km and for a water ice astro-body must be >∼ 300 km (see Wikipedia: Dwarf planet: Hydrostatic equilibrium).
Yes.
General relativity (GR)
predicts a sufficiently dense massive
object will collapse to being
black hole
with a
ring singularity
due to rotation
(i.e., a Kerr black hole)
or a point singularity
if there is NO
rotation
(i.e., a
Schwarzschild black hole).
The singularities have
finite mass and
zero
volume, and so have
infinite density.
However, most people believe that true
singularities
are avoided by quantum gravity, but
we have NO established
quantum gravity theory, and so
NO established
theory of what happens
deep in black holes.