Ancient Babylonian astronomers and why we have 360° in the circle

    Figure: Ancient Babylonian astronomers and why we have 360° in the circle

    Caption: The ancient Babylonian astronomers circa 500--300 BCE divided the circle in 360 units which we call degrees (°) (see Ne-25 or Otto Neugebauer 1969, The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, p. 25; Wikipedia: Degree (angle): History).

    They did NOT tell us why 360°, but we can guess at 3 reasons, some weighted combination of which were probably important to them as to why the degree as defined was a good natural unit:

    1. The year however counted (e.g., Julian year = 365.25 days exactly by definition, solar year = 365.2421897 days (J2000); sidereal year = 365.256363004 days (J2000), etc.) is ∼ 360 days. By choosing 360° in the circle, the angular velocity ω of Sun on the celestial sphere works out to be very nearly 1 degree/day. (To be exact, angular velocity ω = 0.985626 ... degree/day for the Julian year (J2000).) With a good approximate angular velocity of 1 degree/day, it is easy to calculate Sun movements approximately and mentally estimating them is easy too. So for Sun tracking purposes, the degree is a good natural unit.

      Note the Babylonian astronomers would NOT have wanted to make the degree yield exactly (to within their uncertainty) a solar angular velocity of 1 degree/day since that would have divided the circle into an inconvenient non-integer number of degrees. Inconvenient for mental understanding and for simple calculations including especially division.

      Why did the Babylonian astronomers want especially to keep track of the position of the Sun on the celestial sphere? Oh, astrology. If the Sun is in a particular zodiac sign at the time of your birth, then that is your zodiac sign and your whole life story can be previewed---for a fee.

    2. The Babylonian astronomers (and Babylonian mathematicians too, of course) for mathematics and astronomy used a sexagesimal system (base-60 system) (which has 12 divisors: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, 60) and NOT a decimal system (base-10 system) which they used probably mostly in everyday life---counting on the old fingers, you know.

      So obviously dividing the circle into a multiple of their sexagesimal base 60 would have been convenient for calculations.

      In one sense dividing the circle into 60 units would be the most consistent choice.

      But such an angular unit would be unconveniently large for precise astronomy and would need sub-units even for approximate work.

      So the obvious convenient division was into 360 units which gives units that are small enough without being too small and which give an angular velocity of close to 1 degree/day which satisfies the first reason given above.

      Also 360 is a conveniently 6 times the sexagesimal base 60. The number 6 is closely related to the sexagesimal base 60 (it's 60 divided by 10) and has 4 highly useful divisors itself: 1, 2, 3, 6.

      Note that the sexagesimal system came into use circa 2000 BCE (see Wikipedia: Babylonian numerals: Origin), and so was NOT chosen to get a good base system for Babylonian astronomy: it just worked out that way fortuitously.

      Would the Babylonian astronomers have chosen to the divide the circle into a multiple of their base 60 even if days in the year had NOT been close to any such multiple? Who knows. It might have depended on chance or on some weighting of advantages that we do NOT know of.

    3. Since 360 has 24 divisors divisors (including the first 6 positive integers), division with 360 is often easy. Thus, in arithmetic with angles, dividing the circle into 360° is a great simplification since the result of many common division operations is often a whole number: i.e., a number with NO trailing digits in a decimal fraction.

      So even if the Babylonian astronomers had NOT used a sexagesimal base system, dividing the circle into 360° would have been convenient.

      See Table: The 24 Divisors of 360 below.


      Table: The 24 Divisors of 360


        Count       small     large
            2           1       360
            4           2       180
            6           3       120
            8           4        90
           10           5        72
           12           6        60
           14           8        45
           16           9        40
           18          10        36
           20          12        30
           22          15        24
           24          18        20 

    Emphasis: Some weighted combination of the 3 reasons given above are very likely why the Babylonian astronomers divided the circle into 360°. But we do NOT know for sure. Given that the 3 reasons were the reasons, the way Babylonian astronomers weighted them is uncertain. The weighting could have been a bit random as their system of angular units evolved.

    Credit and/or file tracking information follows to the divider line:

    Credit/Permission:
    © David Jeffery, 2003 / Own work.
    Image link: Itself.
    Local file: local link: babylonian_360_degrees.html.
    Extended file: Babylon file: babylonian_360_degrees_4.html.
    Alternate extended file: Babylon file: babylonian_360_degrees_5.html.
    File: Babylon file: babylonian_360_degrees.html.