Next: About this document ...
Up: Bra-ket notation
Previous: Matrix representation of operators
Suppose we have a basis set
that is complete. These
states might be eigenstates of some hermitian operator, say A.
If we have another hermitian operator B, then the eigenstates
of B could also serve as a complete basis set, lets call it
.
We define the
operator
,
and its adjoint
.
Note that
 |
(1.46) |
and we can show, in the same manner, that
.
In other
words, the adjoint of operator U is its inverse U-1.
Operators that have this property are called unitary operators.
Consider any Hilbert space operator
where
is the matrix
representation of X with respect to basis
.
Alternatively, we can
express X in terms of the
basis.
where
is the matrix representation of X in the
|bn> basis, or
 |
(1.47) |
We multiply this relation by the bra <al| on the left,
and by ket |ap> on the right to get
 |
(1.48) |
but,
and
or
 |
(1.49) |
In matrix notation this equation is simply written
 |
(1.50) |
that is, operator X, whose matrix representation is given
by
in the |an> basis, is related to
the matrix representation of X in the |bn> basis,
,
by the above relation. (Note:
is the matrix representation
of operator X in the |an> representation).
Matrix equations that have this structure
are called similarity transformations, and have important properties.
On of such properties is that the eigenvalues of a matrix are invariant
under a unitary similarity transformation. That means even though
,
and
are different matrices,
their eigenvalues are the same since they are related by a unitary
similarity transformation. This implies that we can always find
for any operator representation
so that the transformed matrix is diagonal. It's eigenvalues are
then distributed on the diagonal.
Next: About this document ...
Up: Bra-ket notation
Previous: Matrix representation of operators
Bernard Zygelman
1999-09-21