Photometry
    31.65    0.000  16.88  15.51   0.000   0.000          lkp93
    34.65    0.     16.94  15.62   0.      0.             lkp93
    33.64    0.     17.07  15.71   0.      0.             lkp93
    35.64    0.     17.05  15.74   0.      0.             lkp93
    36.64    0.     17.07  15.76   0.      0.             lkp93
    39.65    0.     17.17  15.88   0.      0.             lkp93
    40.65    0.     17.20  15.94   0.      0.             lkp93
    49.64    0.     17.38  16.36   0.      0.             lkp93
    64.62    0.     17.73  16.36  16.51   16.06           lkp93
    66.59    0.     17.82  16.95  16.80   16.34           lkp93
    68.63    0.     17.87  17.01  16.90   16.31           lkp93
    70.63    0.     17.88  17.06  16.97   16.55           lkp93
    81.59    0.     18.25  17.53  17.41   16.67           lkp93
    84.67    0.     18.15  17.42   0.      0.             lkp93
    86.60    0.     18.26  17.58   0.     16.56           lkp93
    95.71    0.      0.    17.96   0.      0.             lkp93
    96.71    0.     18.71  17.92   0.      0.             lkp93
   100.54    0.     18.53  18.00   0.      0.             lkp93
   128.49    0.     18.88  18.49   0.      0.             lkp93
   150.59    0.     19.68  19.48   0.      0.             lkp93
   154.40    0.     19.78  19.90  19.77   18.81           tbc96
   170.28    0.      0.    19.74  18.39   18.04           lkp93
   184.59    0.     19.96  20.03   0.      0.             lkp93
   214.32    0.     21.03  21.19  21.04    0.             tbc96
   541.37    0.      0.    24.95   0.      0.             tbc96
END:


lkp93=Leibundgut et al. 1993, AJ, 105, 301
tbc96=Turatto et al. 1996, MNRAS, ????
frb92=Filippenko et al. 1992, AJ, 104, 1543

Note that there seems to be considerable discrepancy in the
photometry between the two papers.  Since I trust lkp93 more,
I won't use the tbc96 data except at late times when there is
no comparable lkp93 data.