Sections
At least when at its brightest, it is the 3rd brightest astro-body coming in after the Sun and the Moon.
Because it is an inner planet it is always close to the Sun in the sky: maximum elongation is about 46 degrees (Ze2002-15).
Thus, it is only a morning and evening star: in fact the Morning Star and Evening Star of history.
A space shuttle pre-dawn with Venus and Mars. Discovery, 1995aug03
Venus is the brighter star. If you see Mars near the Sun in angle, it must beyond the Sun in space and therefore will be relatively dim compared to Venus.
The shapes are not significant I think: some artifact of the imaging process.
Venus is the Morning and the Evening Star. I've only seen it as the Morning Star in 1994 when I tramped across the Englischer Garten in Munich at 6:00 am or so.
As the Morning Star it is called the Son of Morning in the Bible, or Bringer of Light: i.e., Lucifer.
Credit: NASA.
Answer 2 is right.
Remember the ancient point of view in which the sky is a giant dome over the flat Earth.
Babylonian Cosmos? A cartoon of what some Babylonians may have
thought.
Here the crescent Moon is east of the Sun, and so is most visible after the Sun has set in the west.
But from Earth-based telescopes in the visible it is almost a featureless yellowish-white (HI-170).
What we are seeing is the highly reflective cloud cover that totally covers VENUS.
Only with using other frequency bands to study VENUS and sending probes to orbit and land on VENUS has Venus' nature elucidated somewhat.
The most important PROBES have been:
______________________________________________________________________________
Table of Venus Facts
______________________________________________________________________________
Quantity Value
_______________________________________________________________________________
Mean distance from the Sun 0.7233 astronomical units
Eccentricity of orbit 0.0068 : which is the smallest planetary
eccentricity: i.e., the orbit
is the most circular.
Mean inclination to Ecliptic 3.39471 degrees
Axis tilt to orbital pole 2.7 degrees : which is very small.
Orbital period 224.695 days
Rotational Period 243.0187 days : and its a retrograde rotation
(i.e., clockwise looking
down from the north ecliptic pole.)
Venusian day 116.74 days = about 117 days
Equatorial radius 6052 km = 0.95 R_Earth_equatorial
Mass 4.870*10**24 kg = 0.815 Earth masses
Mean density 5.24 g/cm**3 = a bit less than mean Earth density
Uncompressed mean density 4.2 g/cm**3 = uncompressed mean Earth density
Surface gravity 0.903 Earth gravities
Surface temperature about 470 C or 740 K all the time : its hot
_________________________________________________________________________
Sources: Cox-294,295, Se-418,467, HI-169.
Answer 2 is right.
Every day (and they are very long days too: 116.74 days) is much like any other day on Venus weatherwise.
In fact, changes during a day are probably what one could call the ``seasons.'' But except for lighting, those changes are not very extreme either.
The total temperature variation may only be about 10 K from hot to cold regions (Ze2002-184). We discuss why below.
And its axial rotation is RETROGRADE: i.e., it rotates westward or clockwise looking down from the North Ecliptic Pole.
These unusual rotation characteristics violate the trends that we believe the PROTOPLANETARY DISK set up.
Well answer 3 is the favored one, but answer 2 has been suggested too
(Se-467).
The Venusian day fully explained.
We can apply the general day formula from IAWL Lecture 12: The Moon and Mercury to calculate the Venusian day.
First, say that counterclockwise motion is positive, and count as
negative the periods of any clockwise motion.
The general day formula non-extreme axial tilt is
P_rev x P_rot
P_day = ---------------------- .
P_rev - P_rot
In the case of Venus, P_rot = -243.01 days and P_rev = 224.68 days.
Thus
224.68 x (-243.01)
P_day_Venus = ---------------------------- = -116.74 days .
224.68 - (-243.01)
The fact that the Venusian day turns out negative means that
the planet turns clockwise from the Sun, but
that means that on the Venus, the Sun moves counterclockwise
or east across the sky: the Sun rises west and sets east.
This causes Venus' surface temperature to be 740 K (or 470 C) which is hotter than MERCURY'S mid-day temperature of about 600 K.
Also Venus' surface temperature is pretty constant with location and time of day for reasons will go into below.
_______________________________________________________________________
Venusian Atmospheric Composition by Number
_______________________________________________________________________
Gas Percentage
(%)
_______________________________________________________________________
CO_2 96.5
N_2 3.5
SO_2 0.015
water vapor
sulfuric acid (H_2SO_4)
hydrochloric acid (HCl)
hydrofluoric acid (HF)
and other stuff <0.03
______________________________________________________________________
References: HI-171;
CW-35;
Se-467.
______________________________________________________________________
The Venusian atmosphere
(Se-467,468).
The complete cloud cover of Venus (which gives it its bland yellowish white color in the visible) is in 3 main layers that span 48--68 km above the surface (Se-467).
The clouds are thought to be mostly sulfuric acid droplets and sulfur crystals (Se-467).
A thin haze of ??? extends down to 33 km (Se-467).
The lower altitudes are, in fact, quite clear.
But the thick CO_2 atmosphere strongly absorbs in the blue ???? and this makes the illumination ORANGY (HI-173; FMW-194).
If the illumination is ORANGY, everything looks ORANGY on the surface. We will show a picture below.
Not a lot of sunlight gets to the surface: only about 3 % (Ze2002-184) which is a lot less than the 40 % of the sunlight that gets to the Earth's surface (Ze2002-157).
The daytime illumination would be about the same as that of an Earth day with heavy cloud cover (FMW-194).
Answer 3 is right. Remember night is about 58.37 days long.
I think there might be sometimes lightning on Venus, but I can't find where I noticed that.
Occasionally, a volcanic eruption might provide some illumination.
Of course, we are discussing the visible: in the infrared, the Venusian surface is probably quite bright compared to Earth because of high blackbody-like emission.
Answer 2 is right.
The ground is not quite red hot it seems, but it is close.
Apparently, to be red hot to the eye the temperature has to be above 500 C or 770 K ( The Physics Factbook). The Venus surface temperature is just a bit low at 470 C or 740 K. But I wonder if it might not appear just slightly reddish under dark conditions.
A Venera 13 lander image of the Venus surface. 1982mar01.
The Venera 13 survived only 2 hr, 7 minutes in the hot, high pressure conditions on Venus.
Part of the lander and a camera lens are at the bottom of the picture.
Flat rocks and soil are visible.
The rock seems to be similar to terrestrial basalt (i.e., dark, denser silicates rich in magnesium and iron probably formed from rapid cooling of lava probably on the surface).
The top image is true color to the Venusian atmosphere where blue light is filtered out. The bottom image is an attempt to correct the image to Earth lighting.
The lander's colored bar (seen in the image) had a known color scheme and that allowed the correction to Earth lighting.
Credit: Soviet space agency; download site Views of the Solar System by Calvin J. Hamilton. CJH admits this is public domain, but declines to give a download source.
For some reason, the Soviets always pointed their cameras at the ground, and so there are no actual VENUS PANORAMAS as far as I know.
There is a bit of horizon at the edges of their broad images.
Probably, technical limitations forced them to use a fixed camera angle.
There are modeled panoramas based on radar mapping as we will see below.
Science fiction writers once speculated that the high reflectivity of the Venusian clouds might keep the surface from being super-hot. They envisioned a perpetual rain on a swampy Venus inhabited by swamp creatures: e.g., Ray Bradbury in The Illustrated Man.
Recall not a lot of sunlight of does get to the surface: only about 3 % (Ze2002-184) which is a lot less than the 40 % of the sunlight that gets to the Earth's surface (Ze2002-157).
But the EXTREME GREENHOUSE EFFECT caused by the dense CO_2 atmosphere still makes the surface super-hot: about 740 K (470 C) which is hot enough to melt lead and tin (CAC-52).
The closeness to the Sun was the key factor that set VENUS on the road to perdition.
After VENUS formed and cooled enough to hold any kind of an atmosphere, volcanic outgassing probably gave it a mainly CO_2 and water vapor atmosphere that may have been much like Earth's early atmosphere.
A cartoon of volcanic outgassing.
But VENUS was just too hot for liquid water either ever or for retaining it if it ever existed.
The water vapor in fact was largely lost. Convection probably carried it to high altitudes where UV sunlight broke it up and the hydrogen escaped.
The outgassing of CO_2 continued creating the super-CO_2 atmosphere of today and the EXTREME GREENHOUSE EFFECT.
The extreme heat of the surface baked sulfur, chlorine, and fluorine out of the ground, and so gave rise to vapors of sulfuric acid (H_2SO_4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and hydrofluoric acid (HF).
Volcanoes are also probably injecting sulfur compounds into the atmosphere (FK-251).
The high altitude weather at the cloud layers is best known because we can see it and probes have gone down through it.
But what we do know about the surface is that the temperature is extremely uniform from equator to poles and from day to night side.
The total variation may only be about 10 K from hot to cold regions (Ze2002-184).
Now the Moon and Mercury are slow rotators with days of 29.5 and 176 Earth days, respectively. They both show extreme daily variations in temperature: i.e., 300 K for the Moon and 500 K for Mercury.
The pattern is best described as two giant VORTICES that are centered on the poles with jet stream winds of up to of order 300 km/hr always moving west mainly at the cloud layer.
The vortices split at the equator and spiral to the poles. They make a distinctive Y pattern. (Se-467--468; FK-250).
``Ultraviolet image of Venus'
clouds as seen by the Pioneer Venus Orbiter (Feb. 5, 1979).''
This is false color, of course. The pattern is not at all as distinct in the visible.
The clouds are at 50--70 km in altitude and are moving west at speeds of up to of order 300 km/hr The whole atmosphere seems to rotate with a period of about 4 days.
The pattern is of two vortices that split at the equator and spiral to the pole.
The Y pattern of the clouds is clearly seen.
Credit: NASA.
The atmosphere is heated on the day side most intensely near the equator.
The hot air convects to the poles and night side at relatively high altitudes.
But somehow the pattern is two symmetric western spirals that are mirrored about the equator, and NOT an axially symmetric flow around the Sun-Venus line.
A contrafactual picture of Venusian convection.
In this case it is a giant impactor is not to blame.
The air rises and the equator and swirls westward to the poles where it sinks flows back in a westward??? swirl to the equator. The westward flow distributes the heat to the night side of Venus.
The circulation flow is in the main cloud layer where one has the high speed winds of 350 km/hr. The air flows around Venus in about 4 days (FK-250).
And it seems that the slow rotation causes Venus to NOT exhibit local cyclones and anticyclones that make Earth's weather so unpredictable and variable (Se-468).
Turbulence with vortices occurs in fluids when one trys to change fluid speeds too quickly.
The Earth from Apollo 17, 1972dec07.
One of the few images showing a full Earth. Blue oceans, anticyclones, To the south Antarctica and Madagascar. At the northern edge: India, Asia, Europe. Greece, Israel, Arabia, Egypt. Somewhere near the center is Oldavai Gorge.
Credit: NASA .
The VENUS cloud pattern pretty much looks the same all the time.
As far as we can tell VENUS does NOT have much weather variation. Recall it has little seasonal variation.
On VENUS probably every 117-day day is probably much like any other.
We know less about the surface winds on VENUS, but they are much slower than the cloud layer winds it seems on average: maybe about 1 m/s or 4 km/hr (CW-37).
Remember the surface air is awfully dense (or of order 1/10 of water), and so has a lot of inertia (i.e., resistance to acceleration).
Of course, we have NO SEISMOLOGY. The Soviet VENERA LANDERS only survived a few hours on the surface at most: no time to wait for earthquakes even if they had seismometers.
We have no Venus rocks, but the VENERA LANDERS did take some pictures and did some crude analysis.
Although the atmosphere of Venus is radically different than Earth's we might expect the geology to be somewhat similar with the vast exceptions of NO water erosion and weathering and NO sedimentation.
Should is NOT the same as is.
To investigate PLATE TECTONICS, we will first consider some Magellan mosaic radar images of Venus.
Five hemisphere views from Magellan radar maps.
Lava flows and faults appear as bright in the image.
Radar mapping is sensitive to the roughness of terrain and relatively younger lava is rougher than older material. This is how lava flows have been distinguished (Se-470).
Map a is centered on the north pole. Maxwell Montes is the bright region near the center: it is the highest mountain range on Venus.
The other maps are centered on the equator.
Map b at 0 longtitude.
Map c at 90 longtitude.
Map c at 180 longtitude.
Map d at 270 longtitude.
The color is false, of course, but was chosen to emphasize structural detail and simulate the colors seen on the surface by the Soviet Venera landers.
The scattered dark patches are halos surrounding the youngest impact craters. A study of the impact craters shows that Venus' surface is probably 500 to 800 Myr old (HI-177). (The time scales vary with reference source.)
Credit: NASA. See NASA Caption.
Now the radar mosaics are cute, but how about a TOPOGRAPHICAL ELEVATION MAP.
Venus Mercator topographical map based on Magellan radar mapping.
The extended high region near the north pole is Ishtar Terra (about the size of Australia) of and the one near the equator is Aphrodite Terra (about the size of Africa). A lower altitude Lada Terra is near the south pole.
The terras are the continents of Venus and they rise above the lowland lava plains with rolling hills which are analogous to the oceanic basins of Earth (Se-471???).
About 60 % of Venus is lowlands and 40 % uplands: the uplands are 24 % terras and 16 % are huge volcanic peak regions (HI-174--175). The terras are less extensive than Earth's continents that cover 41 % of the Earth (Cox-253).
Most of the rock found by the Soviet Venera Landers was basaltic (i.e., fast cooled lava that becomes dark iron and magnesium rich rock). This rock is similar to oceanic basalt and presumably was found on the Venusian lowlands.
One of the Soviet Venera Landers found granitic rock which is what Earth continents are dominated by (HI-175). But was it found on a terra????.
Maxwell Montes is the red region on Ishtar Terra. It is the highest mountain range on Venus.
Maxwell Montes rises about 11 km above the lowland plains. It was named for James Clerk Maxwell and is the only feature named for a male on Venus. Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism led to radar (after a 70 years) and so was fittingly honored on a radar map (Se-191).
Credit: NASA; download site: Views of the Solar System by Calvin J. Hamilton. CJH admits this is public domain, but declines to give a download source.
Does Venus have PLATE TECTONICS?
There are no large arcs of fold mountains that often indicate plate boundaries on Earth???.
Answer 3 is right.
Remember the continental shelves extend well beyond the coasts.
Perhaps there is bit of plate tectonic action on VENUS, but it never fully into full plate tectonics with extensive continents and arcs of fold mountains as on EARTH.
Perhaps much of VENUS can be described as hotspot volcanism where rising MANTLE PLUMES of magma lead to volcanoes and perhaps much of the uplands.
Giant mantle convection cells (leading to plate boundaries) may not be extensive.
Why is PLATE TECTONICS at least under-developed on Venus and perhaps not really present at all?
As of yet, there is no definitive answer, but it may be that the surface heat of Venus makes the surface layers too plastic for plate tectonics with rigid plates (Se-476).
Perhaps abundant liquid water is needed as a lubricant (Gri-172,173). Hydrated rocks may be needed for allow plates to slide.
On the other hand the bit by which Venus is SMALLER than Earth may be essential difference.
It built up from protoplanets and planetesimals
It was hot from formation and radioactivity.
It CHEMICALLLY DIFFERENTIATED.
No GIANT IMPACTOR created a moon, but one may have given Venus it's unusual rotation characteristics as discussed above.
VENUS did suffer the HEAVY BOMBARDMENT, but continuing geological activity has erased the EARLY CRATERING just as on Earth.
VENUS is almost the same size as the Earth and very probably has the same composition of refractories and radioactive elements.
Thus, its RESIDUAL/RADIOACTIVE-HEAT GEOLOGY should continue to the present.
VENUS like the Moon and Mercury and probably the Earth, had lava flooding of huge basins.
And VENUS still has lava plains---the gently rolly lowlands that cover 60 % of the surface (HI-174,175).
But those lava plains are not the original lava plains.
VENUS like the EARTH has been re-surfaced probably several times.
We know this for sure because of impact cratering.
Venus has about 900 observed impact craters.
Answer 1 is right.
A 3-d model of Venus impact crater Golubkina based Magellan radar mapping.
The color is false, of course, but was chosen to emphasize structural detail and simulate the colors seen on the surface by the Soviet Venera landers.
The vertical scale may be stretched to emphasize the features.
This seems to be a typical impact crater with central peak, flatish floor, and slumping rim walls.
Credit: NASA; download site: Views of the Solar System by Calvin J. Hamilton. This image is public domain, but CJH declines to give a download source.
The relatively small number of craters on VENUS tell us that the surface has been re-surfaced and it can be estimated from the crater counts that the current surface is on average somewhere in the range of 500--800 Myr old (HI-177). (The time scales vary with reference source.)
The whole surface is probably younger than 1 Gyr.
The implied renewal rate does seem to be about five times slower than for the Earth on average (CW-34).
On the other hand the Earth has some very old patches that Venus may lack (HI-177). (But how do we know this????.)
More cratering and slower renewal than Earth can at least partially be accounted for by the LACK of water erosion.
The only things that can erase craters are volcanic lava flows and ash deposition and small amounts of fold-mountain construction and wind erosion.
An interesting point about Venusian craters are that there are none smaller than about 3 km in diameter (Se-473).
Answer 1 is right.
Of course, there is NO micrometeoritic erosion on Venus pulverizing the surface to regolith as on the Moon and Mercury.
What are the forces of continuing geologic change besides cratering?
There is wind erosion as mentioned above, but this is slow compared to the absent water erosion.
So we come to VOLCANISM driven by residual/radioactive heat.
Volcanic action creates new lava flows and ash layers that cover old terrain.
Some horizontal crustal movement initiated by lava flooding may created limited fold mountains (Se-471).
SHIELD VOLCANOES such as occur on Earth and Mars are present.
A cartoon of a shield volcano.
A model 3-d view of Gula Mons and Crater Cunitz on the western
part of Eistla Regio.
Lava flows and faults appear as bright in the image.
Eistla Regio is about at the west end of Aphrodite Terra and south of the east end of southmost reaching part of Ishtar Terra.
The image is based on radar data from the Magellan orbiter The colors are meant to imitate those shown by the Soviet Venera 13 and 14 landers and are used to enhance surface structure.
The elevations have been stretched by a factor 22.5 ??? to enhance visualization ( NASA NSSDC Photo Gallery Venus)..
You are looking from an elevation of 0.78 km to the north-east toward Gula Mons which is 1,310 kilometers away.
Gula Mons is a 3 km high volcano: it is a normal shield volcano (Se-473), but the stretching has made it look a bit unnatural???. The height is relative to the Eistla Regio ( NASA NSSDC Photo Gallery Venus).
Gula is a Babylonian earth mother: symbolically a creative force---I just quote the sources.
Impact Crater Cunits is named for Polish mathematician and astronomer Maria Cunitz (1610--1664). It is in the foreground and 215 km from the observer. The crater diameter 48.5 km. It shows the rim and flatish inner floor with a central peak of a typical large impactor crater.
JPL Multimission Image Processing Laboratory produced the image for release at a 1991mar05 JPL news conference.
Credit: NASA/JPL; download site: Views of the Solar System by Calvin J. Hamilton. CJH admits this is public domain, but declines to give a download source.
One volcanic feature unique to Venus are CORONAS.
Boann Corona on Venus with multidinous shield volcanoes from Magellan
radar mapping.
There are also about 360 roughly circular domes or depressions called CORONAS surrounded by circular and radial fractures and located with some volcanoes (HI-176).
Some are flooded by lava.
These features are typically 200 to 400 km in diameter. They may also represent extreme hotspot volcanism where there is a rising mantle plume of magma.
Upwelling lava would create dome which later can subside to create a depression.
Coronas are NOT found on any other solar system body.
Boann is about 225 km across on its shortest side. There are multidinous small shield volcanoes on Boann lava-flooded center. Credit: NASA.
There are many other geological features on Venus (such as pancake domes), but we won't consider them here.
The locations of volcanoes, coronas, terras, etc. are probably random and determined by the random initial conditions, plus gigayears of continuous geological evolution.
One odd last thing to remark is that Venus has no measurable GLOBAL MAGNETIC FIELD.
But Venus really should have a molten iron core like the Earth.
Maybe the slow rotation of Venus is NOT sufficient to generate a dynamo effect (Se-476).
Then Venus will get evaporated in the Sun's red giant phase in 7--8 Gyr (FK-493).